Monday, February 4, 2008

Bugging Khan

Today was a long day. I worked on my fun Prius project for most of the day, though I need someone to give me data before I can get much further. I went to FHE immediately after work, which was fun, I socialized and got to know several people better.

The major event of interest of the day, however, occurred as I was taking one of my “read the newspaper” breaks. Usually I start off with the Washington Post, then move to the New York Times, followed by some light fair by perusing CNN, ESPN, and GoogleNews headlines. Then it’s onto the Wall Street Journal, followed by a brief skimming of my hometown paper, the IndyStar. Then, when I feel like I’ve covered all America has to offer me, I move to England.

So off to the British papers I go when…wait! What’s that? A familiar face is staring at me. On the front
page of every paper. What on earth did my favorite MP DO!?!

It’s a rapidly unfolding story – to get all of the background I suggest google-newsing “Sadiq Khan” and reading articles from the past several days. But it looks like around three years ago, Sadiq held a series of visits with one of his constituents who has been charged with plotting terrorism, and who the US wishes to have extradited here. The Scotland Yard, against all authorization, policy, and practice, had these prison cell conversations bugged and recorded. Now everyone is furious – an MP should NEVER be bugged – Muslims feel targeted and even more distrustful of their government – Justice Secretary Jack Straw has launched an investigation – it’s all fascinating. How I wish I could be back in Norman Shaw South today! Of course, then I probably wouldn’t be allowed to tell you anything. Now I’m safe, since I’m just citing what the newspapers have said.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I first heard about this on the BBC this morning (2/5/08). I, too, am shocked. It appears that the police acted improperly, and, worse, Home Office knew about it and did nothing.

I have one minor quibble, however. I don't think that MPs should -never- be bugged. If there is sufficient evidence, and due process is followed, and an independent judiciary authorizes a search warrant (or the UK equivalent), then it could be legitimate, same as, say, an FBI corruption sting in a Senator's office.

In this case, however, it certainly appears there was -not- proper authorization, and I join with everyone who is appalled.

I am not an expert on UK law, but I think it reasonable to say that a constituent/MP conversation should be afforded the same reasonable protections of confidentiality that you would expect from a client/lawyer -- ooops, barrister, sorry -- discussion.

Anonymous said...

P.S. I also wonder how much of this is discrimination against Sadiq because he is Muslim. Would Scotland Yard have been so quick to listen in on, say, David Cameron and one of his constituents?

P.P.S. I know this is off topic, but what is up with Jack Straw asking female Muslims to remove their niqabs? (Veil that covers the entire face except for the eyes, as opposed to the hijab, which covers only the hair.) I can see why it might be reasonable to ask Muslim women to remove their coverings in specific situations -- like to get a driver's license -- but if I walked into the office of my Representative and he asked me to remove my shirt so we could communicate better, I would be offended.

And it would not facilitate communication.

P.P.P.S. Jon had a great idea about the naqib/driver's license issue. He suggested that a female DMV employee take the picture, issue the license, and then that the Muslim woman cover the license picture with a scrap of cloth. If pulled over, she could insist the she would only remove -both- veils in the presence of a female police officer. I laughed, but then I thought, "That's a good idea!"

P.P.P.P.S. Perhaps I should post my own blog entries rather than rant all over yours. Sorry. ;)

--Gail